4 John,
To the seven
churches in the province of Asia:
John specifically and deliberately indicates that he is writing a
letter to seven churches in the province of Asia. These churches are named in the yet to come verse
11. This revelation is for them. This prophesy is to them. This can lend itself to be important from a
learning perspective.
Biblical Hermeneutics is the study of the principles and methods
of interpreting the text of the Bible.
In simple definition, it uses three laws. 1) The Bible should be interpreted
literally. It has a plain meaning and
when it can, it should be taken for what it says. 2) The Bible passages must be interpreted
historically, grammatically, and contextually. Interpreting a passage
historically means we must seek to understand the culture, background, and
situation that prompted the text. And 3)
Scripture is always the best interpreter of Scripture. We always compare Scripture with Scripture
when trying to determine the meaning of a passage. The second law of
hermeneutics is particularly interesting and can lend itself to great
eye-opening perceptions of what the written Word might have also implied. However, there can be a danger with this law
and it is important to always realize that this method of interpretation must
also be balanced with the literal interpretation of verses where possible and
further supported by other Biblical text.
Yet with visions, symbols and figures of speech being used in text it
isn’t possible to be completely literal in interpretation so it becomes crucial
to understand the context of the writing at that time and to also see how other
Bible text supports the possible meaning of visions, symbols and figures of
speech used.
For example, a Hebrew perspective of a Biblical narrative can be
interpreted differently than a typical American or Greek type of trained
learning perception. We, being American,
are very factual in our learning. What
is the date that ties to an event – memorize it. What are the facts – use them to calculate
solutions. Hebrew schools, while factual
about events, are very story oriented.
For further example, when describing Goliath, anyone from a Western
culture wants a description of how tall was he, how big was the armor and how
long was his sword. List the details and
we then are quick to put a size to him. We
translate that he was about 9’-9” tall, his armor weighed about 125 pounds and
his iron shaft weighed about 15 pounds (1 Samuel 17:4-7). Anyone from a Hebrew culture might tend to see
the same descriptions differently. They
would see 6 cubits tall as 6. They would
see the 600 shekels his iron point weighed as 6. It would not be too difficult for them to see
666 and a description of his armor as scales to indicate that Goliath was
Satan, the snake, the one who opposes God.
Then they would further read that David collected five stones, the
number of the writings of Moses and that David planted that Word into Goliath’s
forehead and it crushed him. The
narrative they would read is that David threw God’s Word at Satan and God’s
Word crushed or bruised him in defeat.
As it is evident, there is a difference in how cultures can “see” a
written story. We tend to see the story
as the power of God in a person who is brave and courageous enough to stand in
front of a giant all simply based on putting the fight into the hands of
God. We know just how big the giant was
and how overwhelming the situation was for young David. So we know that it was God who provided the
victory. Others might see the story of
the fight as only between God and Satan and it was God crushing Satan. David was used, as was Goliath, but the story
is God wins and crushes the enemy of all man.
Overall, there is a lot to be gleaned from either view and the views are
not too different and also supporting of one another. In fact, working to see each aspect tends to
help one gather the whole picture. We
already know there is a spiritual world and war going on that we can’t see. I tend to believe that gathering the
perception of this Hebrew view helps provide some insight into that world, but
it should not be the only law used in interpreting Bible text. Each method of interpretation should support
one another.
All that being described, it is important to realize that the
revelation is for the churches in Asia.
We must seek to understand what was going on historically and culturally
in those churches at that time and what meaning the visions and symbols might
have specifically meant for them reading the text and finally, how that applies
to us today.
No comments:
Post a Comment